The upcoming election offers us a crucial opportunity to make a difference in our community, and Sam Berger, a moderate Democrat, stands out as the candidate who can represent our interests effectively.

Operating within the Democratic caucus provides Sam Berger access to discussions that can shape the direction of policies affecting our community. With a strong stand against the progressive left, he can ensure our needs and interests are represented, addressing issues ranging from hate-related concerns to quality of life problems. He can protect our cherished institutions like yeshivas and community organizations from unwarranted intrusions.

Access means communication, and communication drives compromise and solutions. Sam’s ability to engage with decision-makers gives us the chance to work together and find common ground to address our community’s challenges effectively. In contrast, Republicans have faced continuous marginalization in Albany, leaving them with little say in advocating for their constituents’ concerns. Their exclusion from vital discussions results in pyrrhic victories that fail to improve their communities.

Currently, government funding for local causes, nonprofits, and organizations predominantly flows through the Democratic caucus due to their supermajority control, which has lasted for decades. This reality has enabled Democrats to support essential civic organizations like Hatzalah and Tomchei Shabbos.

However, these pragmatic concerns are not to be taken lightly when we head to the polls. Should we shortsightedly flip the local assembly seat red, we will risk the loss of millions in critical civic funding that sustains our community initiatives. While it is essential to express our views and concerns, we must carefully consider the consequences of our choices and how they will impact our daily lives.

When we vote for Sam Berger, we choose a pragmatic approach that emphasizes collaboration with those in power to secure long-term improvements for our community. Rejecting the fiery rhetoric of the right does not mean compromising on our values; rather, it signifies a commitment to work within the system to effect positive change while resisting the dangerous slide towards radical ideologies.

Meshulam Lisker
Nechemiah Hoch